Articles on Issue Theme
Costea MUNTEANU
Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti
The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) to examine briefly the history and development of the major methodological controversies in economic science (empiricism vs. apriorism; monism vs. dualism; and individualism vs. holism);(2) to survey strengths and weaknesses of each of the methodological approaches involved in these controversies and, on this basis, to identify the controversy which is best positioned as a candidate for being neutralized; and (3) to investigate the attempts already undertaken in literature in order to neutralize the candidate controversy.
Keywords: methodological controversy, individualism, holism, personalism, neutralization of controversy
JEL: B41, B50, B49
Despre controversele metodologice din ştiinţa economică
Select Issue:
Archive
Octavian-Dragomir JORA
Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti
Alexandru POPOVICI
Universitatea Româno-Americană
Ramona Iulia DIEACONESCU
Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti
Andra Nicoleta MECU
Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti
Florentina CHIŢU
Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti
Răzvan PÎRCĂLĂBESCU
Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti
Cristian MANOLACHI
Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti
Anca TAMAŞ
Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti
Authors