Online ISSN 2286-0266
Print ISSN 1223-0685
© 2026 Œconomica by ASE & SOREC
 
Radu CHIOTAN
Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti
This article develops a transparent protocol for selecting and reporting geopolitical and political risk proxies in MENA-focused (Middle East and North Africa) foreign direct investment research. Risk measures are classified by conceptual coverage, temporal resolution, and data-generating process, with attention to measurement error, comparability, and interpretability trade-offs. A concise empirical illustration shows that estimated coefficients and significance levels can shift substantially across commonly used proxies, underscoring the need for standardized robustness reporting. A checklist and decision tree are presented to link research questions – such as short-run shocks versus persistent instability or domestic versus external risk – to proxy choice and recommended diagnostics. The paper aims to reduce arbitrariness in risk measurement and improve cross-study comparability in a region characterized by frequent security and diplomatic shocks.

ŒCONOMICA no. 2/2025
Keywords: foreign direct investment, Middle East and North Africa, geopolitical risk, political risk, risk measurement, proxy selection, robustness
JEL: C18, C52, D81, F21, F23
Measuring Risk for FDI Research in MENA: A Transparent Protocol for Proxy Selection and Robustness